Pai 的 AI 雷达

生信医疗

今天:A Living Benchmark(arXiv:2609),A rubric landscape(arXiv:2610)。并行还有 Can LLMs Reason、OpenMTB-Audit、Scaling Clinical Judgment。

日期
2026/10/03
今日条目
84
当前类目
5
#01

A Living Benchmark for Information Retrieval from Electronic Health Records

arXiv:2609.30205v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based clinical assistants are increasingly being integrated into electronic health record (EHR) systems, transforming how clinicians retrieve and synthesize information from patient records. Their safe

推荐理由该动态基准可用于持续评测和衡量接入电子健康档案系统的大语言模型临床助手,检验其协助临床医生从患者病历中检索与综合关键信息的实际能力与效能,从而助力临床辅助技术的迭代升级。
模型与评测生信医疗arXiv cs.AI 官方
#02

A rubric landscape for evaluating clinical reasoning in large language models: what exists, what is missing, and what needs to be combined

arXiv:2610.01938v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exam-style accuracy does not establish whether large language models (LLMs) reason well over clinical records. We define clinical reasoning as integrating and updating evidence across time and sources to form, revise and justify a

推荐理由该研究构建的评估标准图景可用于突破应试准确率的局限,全面考查大语言模型在临床病历分析中跨越时间与多源信息整合并更新证据的过程,以此评估模型形成、修正和论证临床决策的深度推理能力。
模型与评测生信医疗arXiv cs.AI 官方
#03

Can LLMs Reason Over Long Horizons? An Empirical Evaluation of Context Strategies for Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning

arXiv:2610.00562v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Longitudinal clinical reasoning requires large language models (LLMs) to identify and integrate relevant evidence distributed across extended patient histories. Although long-context models can process increasingly large amounts o

推荐理由可用这项研究设计长时程临床推理的上下文评测:把分散在长期患者历史中的证据整理成连续任务,再比较不同上下文策略能否识别并整合相关信息。描述指出长上下文模型可处理更多内容,但评测仍要围绕证据整合,而非只看输入长度。
模型与评测生信医疗arXiv cs.AI 官方
#04

OpenMTB-Audit: Exposing Over-Refusal and Clinical Expert Perspectives in LLM-Based Molecular Tumor Board Safety Evaluation

arXiv:2610.01497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Molecular tumor boards integrate genomic findings, clinical context, and therapeutic evidence to support precision oncology. As AI enters this workflow, a key safety challenge is distinguishing truly unsupported recommendations from

推荐理由OpenMTB-Audit: Exposing Over-Refusal:arXiv:2610.01497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Molecular tumor boards integrate。
模型与评测生信医疗arXiv cs.AI 官方
#05

Scaling Clinical Judgment to Evaluate Medical AI

arXiv:2609.12822v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Blinded physician evaluation has been considered by many to be the gold standard for assessing clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs). This is difficult to scale; thus, prior studies typically rely on small physician

推荐理由Scaling Clinical Judgment to Evaluate:arXiv:2609.12822v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Blinded physician evaluation has。
模型与评测生信医疗arXiv cs.AI 官方